Summary:
Another paradox of liberalism arising from equation of economic liberalism with capitalism and of economic liberalism as equatable with political liberalism as representative democracy. The rise of interest in social democracy now no accident of history but rather a logical progression of the historical dialectic?Flassbeck EconomicsThe Great Paradox: Liberalism Destroys the Market Economy Heiner Flassbeck
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: capital share, keynesianism, labor share, Ludwig Erhard, Margaret Thatcher, Neoliberalism, Ronald Reagan, wages
This could be interesting, too:
Another paradox of liberalism arising from equation of economic liberalism with capitalism and of economic liberalism as equatable with political liberalism as representative democracy. The rise of interest in social democracy now no accident of history but rather a logical progression of the historical dialectic?Flassbeck EconomicsThe Great Paradox: Liberalism Destroys the Market Economy Heiner Flassbeck
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: capital share, keynesianism, labor share, Ludwig Erhard, Margaret Thatcher, Neoliberalism, Ronald Reagan, wages
This could be interesting, too:
Matias Vernengo writes Keynes’ denial of conflict: a reply to Professor Heise’s critique
Matias Vernengo writes Podcast Failures: Friedman and Chile, Hume and Public Debt
Robert Vienneau writes Labor And Land Are No Commodities
Daniel Becker writes “If things are good, then why do I still have nothing left over?”
Flassbeck Economics
The Great Paradox: Liberalism Destroys the Market Economy
Heiner Flassbeck