by Summary:
As Daniel Neilson describes in this crucial introduction, this is what occupied the mind of the iconoclast economist Hyman Minsky. Rather than a standard academic overview, Neilson’s book is more biographical. He situates Minsky in time and place, exploring a thinker who was forever responding to events around him.... By narrating Minsky’s theoretical developments in their historical context, Neilson introduces with clarity a body of economic thought that has become very influential in the last decade. The focus on central banks, debates about MMT, and the way terms like ‘collateral’ and ‘liquidity’ have become so commonplace in public economic discourse today is testament to Minsky’s focus on the problem of payment. Though Minsky saw himself as building on Keynes’s legacy, Neilson
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
As Daniel Neilson describes in this crucial introduction, this is what occupied the mind of the iconoclast economist Hyman Minsky. Rather than a standard academic overview, Neilson’s book is more biographical. He situates Minsky in time and place, exploring a thinker who was forever responding to events around him.... By narrating Minsky’s theoretical developments in their historical context, Neilson introduces with clarity a body of economic thought that has become very influential in the last decade. The focus on central banks, debates about MMT, and the way terms like ‘collateral’ and ‘liquidity’ have become so commonplace in public economic discourse today is testament to Minsky’s focus on the problem of payment. Though Minsky saw himself as building on Keynes’s legacy, Neilson
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
Robert Vienneau writes A Letter From Marx To Engels In 1858 Outlining His Critique Of Political Economy
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Cutting-edge macroeconomics …
Lars Pålsson Syll writes The greatest of them all
As Daniel Neilson describes in this crucial introduction, this is what occupied the mind of the iconoclast economist Hyman Minsky. Rather than a standard academic overview, Neilson’s book is more biographical. He situates Minsky in time and place, exploring a thinker who was forever responding to events around him....
By narrating Minsky’s theoretical developments in their historical context, Neilson introduces with clarity a body of economic thought that has become very influential in the last decade. The focus on central banks, debates about MMT, and the way terms like ‘collateral’ and ‘liquidity’ have become so commonplace in public economic discourse today is testament to Minsky’s focus on the problem of payment.
Though Minsky saw himself as building on Keynes’s legacy, Neilson shows how it was in fact the influence of Joseph Schumpeter, who supervised Minsky’s PhD work, that was maybe more important. Like Minsky, Schumpeter was interested in how the way credit cycles drove cycles in the real economy, rather than the reverse.
While that may seem obvious it runs counter to orthodoxy....