by Important observatin by Geoffrey Hodgson on marginal productivity and system embeddedness. Conventional economists don't do systems well, as Keynes showed in their overlooking the fallacy of composition, a freshman mistake.In the Cambridge Capital Controversy, Piero Sraffa and Joan Robinson called attention to a similar mistake regarding the use of "capital" in neoclassical modeling.The list goes on.MMT economist have also pointed out many such obvious mistakes regarding money & banking and finance in addition to macroeconomics.This is a high level of incompetence in the field. What is wrong with conventional economists anyway? The Political Economy of DevelopmentDebunking the distributional status quoNick Johnson
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Robert Vienneau writes Austrian Capital Theory And Triple-Switching In The Corn-Tractor Model
Mike Norman writes The Accursed Tariffs — NeilW
Mike Norman writes IRS has agreed to share migrants’ tax information with ICE
Mike Norman writes Trump’s “Liberation Day”: Another PR Gag, or Global Reorientation Turning Point? — Simplicius
Important observatin by Geoffrey Hodgson on marginal productivity and system embeddedness. Conventional economists don't do systems well, as Keynes showed in their overlooking the fallacy of composition, a freshman mistake.
In the Cambridge Capital Controversy, Piero Sraffa and Joan Robinson called attention to a similar mistake regarding the use of "capital" in neoclassical modeling.
The list goes on.
MMT economist have also pointed out many such obvious mistakes regarding money & banking and finance in addition to macroeconomics.
This is a high level of incompetence in the field. What is wrong with conventional economists anyway?
The Political Economy of Development
Debunking the distributional status quo
Nick Johnson