by Summary:
Freedom implies responsibility. There is no legal right to absolute freedom, nor is there a natural (moral) right to it either. Libel laws recognize this legally, for example. But libel laws are civil and only extend to suing for damages. But there is also reputational risk, which is also a deterrent to presumption of an absolute right to freedom. Bill is evoking this latter with respect to professional and academic responsiblity.The rest of the post is about the economic/health tradeoff, and how using the lens of MMT shows a picture different from the conventiona. It didn't have to be this way.Bill Mitchell – billy blogAcademic freedom requires evidence and knowledge – not a desire for headlines Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Freedom implies responsibility. There is no legal right to absolute freedom, nor is there a natural (moral) right to it either. Libel laws recognize this legally, for example. But libel laws are civil and only extend to suing for damages. But there is also reputational risk, which is also a deterrent to presumption of an absolute right to freedom. Bill is evoking this latter with respect to professional and academic responsiblity.The rest of the post is about the economic/health tradeoff, and how using the lens of MMT shows a picture different from the conventiona. It didn't have to be this way.Bill Mitchell – billy blogAcademic freedom requires evidence and knowledge – not a desire for headlines Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
Robert Vienneau writes Why Is Marginalist Economics Wrong?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Freedom implies responsibility. There is no legal right to absolute freedom, nor is there a natural (moral) right to it either. Libel laws recognize this legally, for example. But libel laws are civil and only extend to suing for damages. But there is also reputational risk, which is also a deterrent to presumption of an absolute right to freedom. Bill is evoking this latter with respect to professional and academic responsiblity.
The rest of the post is about the economic/health tradeoff, and how using the lens of MMT shows a picture different from the conventiona. It didn't have to be this way.
Bill Mitchell – billy blog
Academic freedom requires evidence and knowledge – not a desire for headlines
Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia