by Summary:
Why comparing militaries based on budget size is erroneous. Of course, Lockheed will argue that its ships are more than 8X better. Right.Russia Insider Russia Builds Nuclear Icebreakers the Size of WWII Battleships for 0M, Lockheed Needs 0M for Ships 8X SmallerMarko Marjanović
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: military expenditure
This could be interesting, too:
Why comparing militaries based on budget size is erroneous. Of course, Lockheed will argue that its ships are more than 8X better. Right.Russia Insider Russia Builds Nuclear Icebreakers the Size of WWII Battleships for 0M, Lockheed Needs 0M for Ships 8X SmallerMarko Marjanović
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: military expenditure
This could be interesting, too:
Mike Norman writes Dave Majumdar — Why is Russia Building Nuclear Powered Cruise Missiles? The Answer: “Capacity”
Mike Norman writes Rob Smith — Conflict costs the global economy trillion a year
Why comparing militaries based on budget size is erroneous. Of course, Lockheed will argue that its ships are more than 8X better. Right.
Russia Insider
Russia Builds Nuclear Icebreakers the Size of WWII Battleships for $750M, Lockheed Needs $500M for Ships 8X Smaller
Marko Marjanović