by Summary:
While John Stuart Mill is remembered as a philosopher (Utilitarianism and On Liberty), he is also numbered among the prominent classical economists along with Smith and Ricardo. His Principles of Political Economy was widely taught until it was replaced by Alfred Marshall's Principles of Economics.The article observes that while Mill was "progressive for his day," his day was not at all progressive. While he was a bit of a radical at the time, now his work seems quite conservative on comparison with contemporary works.Even so, he was a founder of British liberalism, shaped American liberalism, and is still read today.Counterpunch The Blemishes of John Stuart Mill’s LiberalismEvan Jones
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
While John Stuart Mill is remembered as a philosopher (Utilitarianism and On Liberty), he is also numbered among the prominent classical economists along with Smith and Ricardo. His Principles of Political Economy was widely taught until it was replaced by Alfred Marshall's Principles of Economics.While John Stuart Mill is remembered as a philosopher (Utilitarianism and On Liberty), he is also numbered among the prominent classical economists along with Smith and Ricardo. His Principles of Political Economy was widely taught until it was replaced by Alfred Marshall's Principles of Economics.The article observes that while Mill was "progressive for his day," his day was not at all progressive. While he was a bit of a radical at the time, now his work seems quite conservative on comparison with contemporary works.Even so, he was a founder of British liberalism, shaped American liberalism, and is still read today.Counterpunch The Blemishes of John Stuart Mill’s LiberalismEvan Jones
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
Robert Vienneau writes Why Is Marginalist Economics Wrong?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
The article observes that while Mill was "progressive for his day," his day was not at all progressive. While he was a bit of a radical at the time, now his work seems quite conservative on comparison with contemporary works.
Even so, he was a founder of British liberalism, shaped American liberalism, and is still read today.
Counterpunch
The Blemishes of John Stuart Mill’s Liberalism
Evan Jones