by Summary:
While Peter Radford doesn't mention MMT, his argument can read as a justification of MMT against the mainstream and a take down of mainstream propaganda based on conventional economics. Worth reading.The Radford Free PressConfusion ReignsPeter Radford http://www.radfordfreepress.com/?p=3350
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
While Peter Radford doesn't mention MMT, his argument can read as a justification of MMT against the mainstream and a take down of mainstream propaganda based on conventional economics. Worth reading.The Radford Free PressConfusion ReignsPeter Radford http://www.radfordfreepress.com/?p=3350
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Matias Vernengo writes What is heterodox economics?
While Peter Radford doesn't mention MMT, his argument can read as a justification of MMT against the mainstream and a take down of mainstream propaganda based on conventional economics. Worth reading.
The Radford Free PressConfusion Reigns
Peter Radford
http://www.radfordfreepress.com/?p=3350