Sunday , November 24 2024
Home / Mike Norman Economics / Nudgelords: Given their past track record, why should I trust them this time? (Don’t call me Stasi) Andrew Gelman

Nudgelords: Given their past track record, why should I trust them this time? (Don’t call me Stasi) Andrew Gelman

Summary:
Andrew Gelman smackdown of Cass Sunstein.Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social ScienceNudgelords: Given their past track record, why should I trust them this time? (Don’t call me Stasi)Andrew Gelman | Professor of Statistics and Political Science and Director of the Applied Statistics Center, Columbia UniversityBonusJoan Robinson on conventional economics.Lars P. Syll’s BlogThinking about thinkingLars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo UniversityRelatedBut shared beliefs that are in conflict with science continue to exist, and the rights of people to hold those beliefs are enshrined in the US Constitution and in many other secular democratic countries.Are there costs to this policy? If yes, then how to operationalize the cost-benefit analysis if qualitative data are involved?This is

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Matias Vernengo writes Elon Musk (& Vivek Ramaswamy) on hardship, because he knows so much about it

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Klas Eklunds ‘Vår ekonomi’ — lärobok med stora brister

New Economics Foundation writes We need more than a tax on the super rich to deliver climate and economic justice

Robert Vienneau writes Profits Not Explained By Merit, Increased Risk, Increased Ability To Compete, Etc.

Andrew Gelman smackdown of Cass Sunstein.

Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
Nudgelords: Given their past track record, why should I trust them this time? (Don’t call me Stasi)
Andrew Gelman | Professor of Statistics and Political Science and Director of the Applied Statistics Center, Columbia University


Bonus

Joan Robinson on conventional economics.

Lars P. Syll’s Blog
Thinking about thinking
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University

Related
But shared beliefs that are in conflict with science continue to exist, and the rights of people to hold those beliefs are enshrined in the US Constitution and in many other secular democratic countries.
Are there costs to this policy? If yes, then how to operationalize the cost-benefit analysis if qualitative data are involved?

This is treated differently in different legal systems and jurisdictions. Is there a compelling argument that the US approach to liberalism is "natural" and therefore authoritative universally?

econintersect
Science, Belief, And Democracy
Robert Costanza | Professor and Vice Chancellor’s Chair in Public Policy at the Crawford School of Public Policy
Originally at The Solutions Journal
Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *