by Summary:
Jan Scheffel, Professor from KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, argues that the insolvability of the mind-body problem enables free willIn summary, we have found that reductionistic scientific understanding of subjective conscious processes is not possible; emergence lies in the way. Ontological emergence, in turn, leads to ontological openness which enables downward causation and free willOpen Access Government The unsolvability of the mind-body problem enables free will
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Jan Scheffel, Professor from KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, argues that the insolvability of the mind-body problem enables free willIn summary, we have found that reductionistic scientific understanding of subjective conscious processes is not possible; emergence lies in the way. Ontological emergence, in turn, leads to ontological openness which enables downward causation and free willOpen Access Government The unsolvability of the mind-body problem enables free will
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes When usefulness is more important than precision
Bill Haskell writes The Plan to destroy Obamacare
NewDealdemocrat writes The ISM services index, measuring 75% of the economy, sounds an ‘all clear’ – for now, anyway
Joel Eissenberg writes High fructose corn syrup and your health
Jan Scheffel, Professor from KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, argues that the insolvability of the mind-body problem enables free will
In summary, we have found that reductionistic scientific understanding of subjective conscious processes is not possible; emergence lies in the way. Ontological emergence, in turn, leads to ontological openness which enables downward causation and free will
Open Access Government