by Summary:
Peter Radford has a way of cutting to the chase. This is a short post worth thinking about for those interested in the study of economics as a discipline of thought. While it is a highly simplified analysis of an entire field, it avoids being simplistic. (It's about modeling.)Real-World Economics Review BlogSay it ain’t soPeter Radford
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Peter Radford has a way of cutting to the chase. This is a short post worth thinking about for those interested in the study of economics as a discipline of thought. While it is a highly simplified analysis of an entire field, it avoids being simplistic. (It's about modeling.)Real-World Economics Review BlogSay it ain’t soPeter Radford
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
Robert Vienneau writes Why Is Marginalist Economics Wrong?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Peter Radford has a way of cutting to the chase. This is a short post worth thinking about for those interested in the study of economics as a discipline of thought. While it is a highly simplified analysis of an entire field, it avoids being simplistic. (It's about modeling.)
Real-World Economics Review BlogSay it ain’t so
Peter Radford