by Summary:
Assumes (tacitly) 1) that objective "fact-checking" is possible to achieve and 2) that a majority of consumers of information will deem the so-called fact-checking credible. Both of these implicit assumptions seem questionable evidential in light of mistakes and anecdotally (based on responses when sending people to purported fact-checking sites).New words addressing this have become internet memes, like "truthiness" and "gaslighting."Liberty Street EconomicsBreaking Down the Market for MisinformationGonzalo Cisternas and Jorge Vásquez
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Assumes (tacitly) 1) that objective "fact-checking" is possible to achieve and 2) that a majority of consumers of information will deem the so-called fact-checking credible. Both of these implicit assumptions seem questionable evidential in light of mistakes and anecdotally (based on responses when sending people to purported fact-checking sites).New words addressing this have become internet memes, like "truthiness" and "gaslighting."Liberty Street EconomicsBreaking Down the Market for MisinformationGonzalo Cisternas and Jorge Vásquez
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes How inequality causes financial crises
Robert Vienneau writes Intensive Rent With Two Types Of Land
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Oíche Chiúin, Stille Nacht, Silent Night
Lars Pålsson Syll writes The history of random walks
Assumes (tacitly) 1) that objective "fact-checking" is possible to achieve and 2) that a majority of consumers of information will deem the so-called fact-checking credible.
Both of these implicit assumptions seem questionable evidential in light of mistakes and anecdotally (based on responses when sending people to purported fact-checking sites).
New words addressing this have become internet memes, like "truthiness" and "gaslighting."
Breaking Down the Market for Misinformation
Gonzalo Cisternas and Jorge Vásquez