by The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis published a jaw-droppingly misleading graph that portrays China as spending more on its military than the US. In reality, the Pentagon’s budget is roughly three times larger....When the St. Louis Fed published the deceptive graph on Twitter, it went viral, garnering hundreds of negative responses.Michael P. McDonald, a professor of political science at the University of Florida, quipped, “If they’re willing to put this out, just imagine the internal analyses the Fed conducts to manage the economy”.In an accompanying report, the St. Louis Fed admitted that China’s 2021 defense spending was just 1.7% of GDP, “which was the lowest share among the six nations in the figure…How to Lie with Statistics by Darrell Huff was required reading in my stat course
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Moving forward
Dean Baker writes Health insurance killing: Economics does have something to say
NewDealdemocrat writes Retail Real Sales
Angry Bear writes Planned Tariffs, An Economy Argument with Political Implications
The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis published a jaw-droppingly misleading graph that portrays China as spending more on its military than the US. In reality, the Pentagon’s budget is roughly three times larger....When the St. Louis Fed published the deceptive graph on Twitter, it went viral, garnering hundreds of negative responses.
Michael P. McDonald, a professor of political science at the University of Florida, quipped, “If they’re willing to put this out, just imagine the internal analyses the Fed conducts to manage the economy”.
In an accompanying report, the St. Louis Fed admitted that China’s 2021 defense spending was just 1.7% of GDP, “which was the lowest share among the six nations in the figure…
How to Lie with Statistics by Darrell Huff was required reading in my stat course in college. That was in 1958. It is still 65 years ago. Huff was not a statistician himself but a journalist and he explained how statistics could be used to misrepresent.
There is a big difference between a federal reserve bank doing this and news media. News media can plead journalistic mistake; a federal reserve bank can't. In fact, a mistake would be more worrisome than an intentional attempt to misrepresent, as Professor McDonald (above) implies.
But they make it clear in the article that China's spending is much less than the US. Doesn't that clear them? Compare this to a misleading headline and a correction contained deep in the article. This is actually standard practice in propaganda.
Geopolitical EconomyExaggerating China’s military spending, St. Louis Fed breaks all statistical rules with misleading graph
Ben Norton