Summary:
Another post of conventional economists not being keen on applying logic to their reasoning.Lars P. Syll’s BlogThe Keynes-Tinbergen debate on econometricsLars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo UniversityPolitics seems to suffer from a similar syndrome. While economists sacrifice logic for mathematical modeling including tractability, some politicians appear to be mathematically challenged.[embedded content]
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Another post of conventional economists not being keen on applying logic to their reasoning.Lars P. Syll’s BlogThe Keynes-Tinbergen debate on econometricsLars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo UniversityPolitics seems to suffer from a similar syndrome. While economists sacrifice logic for mathematical modeling including tractability, some politicians appear to be mathematically challenged.[embedded content]
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Matias Vernengo writes What is heterodox economics?
Another post of conventional economists not being keen on applying logic to their reasoning.
Lars P. Syll’s BlogThe Keynes-Tinbergen debate on econometrics
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University
Politics seems to suffer from a similar syndrome. While economists sacrifice logic for mathematical modeling including tractability, some politicians appear to be mathematically challenged.