by Content warning, canceling, de-platforming, denying access: The fate of Sy Hersh’s Democracy Now! interview on YouTube is the latest indication of how much rougher press suppression is in this new media era....The take-away from the article is that society in so-called liberal democracies are as controlled as in so-called authoritarian "regimes." Society in (read capitalist) countries is as controlled by the ruling elite that either belong to the ownership class (haute bourgeosie) or are beholden to it. While Patrick Lawrence doesn't go into how this is accomplished, others have. Control is secured both through ownership of the "commanding heights" of the economy and the fact that the state has been captured through campaign finance, since campaigns are now so expensive that politicians
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Mike Norman writes Trade deficit
Mike Norman writes Bond market now pricing in one 25 bps rate cut by Fed in 2025
New Economics Foundation writes What are we getting wrong about tax
Sandwichman writes The more this contradiction develops…
Content warning, canceling, de-platforming, denying access: The fate of Sy Hersh’s Democracy Now! interview on YouTube is the latest indication of how much rougher press suppression is in this new media era....
The take-away from the article is that society in so-called liberal democracies are as controlled as in so-called authoritarian "regimes." Society in (read capitalist) countries is as controlled by the ruling elite that either belong to the ownership class (haute bourgeosie) or are beholden to it.
While Patrick Lawrence doesn't go into how this is accomplished, others have. Control is secured both through ownership of the "commanding heights" of the economy and the fact that the state has been captured through campaign finance, since campaigns are now so expensive that politicians have become dependent on large contributions and the implicit quid pro quo.
A so-called deep state is put in place to ensure continuity of policy on one hand and also to remove the reins of real power from politicians. With personality and increasingly celebrity being a major factor in political success rather than ability to govern, a system has been established to ensure that policy decisions that serve the interest of the ruling elite are uniform across administrations.
A primary factor in controlling a state in the age of near instantaneous communication is controlling the narrative. This used to be much simpler before the internet and the media is still rather easily controlled. Now with the advent of the Internet, it has become necessary to control that too in order to maintain control of the narrative. The push has been on to do so for some time.
Consortium NewsGoogle Removes 'Don't Be Evil' Clause From Its Code of Conduct
Kate Conger
Patrick Lawrence: Munich as Propaganda Fest
Nonpartisan, publicly funded media is "an idea that we should explore," said the senator
Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to nak his hite in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war... after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the poly and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along... the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patrotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.Nuremberg Diary - by Gustave Gilbert
Interview with Herman Goering