Sunday , May 26 2024
Home / Mike Norman Economics / In Defence Of Discrete Time Models — Brian Romanchuk

In Defence Of Discrete Time Models — Brian Romanchuk

Summary:
Not MMT per se but it has to do with economic modeling that is pertinent to MMT's stock-flow modeling. When looking at Steve Keens's claim about continuous and discrete yesterday, it seemed to me to be a bit off given that economic data is discrete despite the fact that it is reported in terms of flows that are assumed continuous. Brian explains the details of the modeling math clearly and briefly without getting overly wonkish. Bond EconomicsIn Defence Of Discrete Time ModelsBrian Romanchuk

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Post-real economics — a severe case of mathiness

New Economics Foundation writes Energy bills are falling – but the UK is still not protected from future price shocks

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Perché la trasformazione del capitalismo è necessaria

New Economics Foundation writes New Economics Podcast: Do we need to fight for the right to protest?

Not MMT per se but it has to do with economic modeling that is pertinent to MMT's stock-flow modeling. 

When looking at Steve Keens's claim about continuous and discrete yesterday, it seemed to me to be a bit off given that economic data is discrete despite the fact that it is reported in terms of flows that are assumed continuous. Brian explains the details of the modeling math clearly and briefly without getting overly wonkish. 

Bond Economics
In Defence Of Discrete Time Models
Brian Romanchuk

Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *