by There has been a debate following the NYTimes piece on left of center economists against Bernie Sanders. Doug Henwood replied here and Dean Baker here. Henwood does not discuss the Gerald Friedman paper that led to the whole discussion. Now Jamie Galbraith provided a nice reply to the left of center economists that suggested that Bernie's plans are not realistic. He says: "What the Friedman paper shows, is that under conventional assumptions, the projected impact of Senator Sanders' proposals stems from their scale and ambition. When you dare to do big things, big results should be expected. The Sanders program is big, and when you run it through a standard model, you get a big result.That, by the way, is the lesson of the Reagan era – like it or not. It is a lesson that, among today's political leaders, only Senator Sanders has learned." Read full letter here.
Topics:
Matias Vernengo considers the following as important: bernie sanders, Dean Baker, Galbraith, Gerald Friedman, Henwood
This could be interesting, too:
Angry Bear writes Correcting 11 Washington Post’s Charts That Are Supposed to Tell How the Economy Changed Since Covid
Angry Bear writes What One Economist Wants to Hear on Thursday’s SOTU Address
Matias Vernengo writes The Gift of Sanctions
Angry Bear writes Social Security and Medicare: Fun with Numbers Time
Read full letter here."What the Friedman paper shows, is that under conventional assumptions, the projected impact of Senator Sanders' proposals stems from their scale and ambition. When you dare to do big things, big results should be expected. The Sanders program is big, and when you run it through a standard model, you get a big result.
That, by the way, is the lesson of the Reagan era – like it or not. It is a lesson that, among today's political leaders, only Senator Sanders has learned."