Wednesday , December 18 2024
Home / Naked Keynesianism / Tom Palley on Inequality and Growth

Tom Palley on Inequality and Growth

Summary:
New paper published by PERI. From the abstract: This paper examines the relationship between inequality and growth in the neo-Kaleckian and Cambridge growth models. The paper explores the channels whereby functional and personal income distribution impact growth. The growth – inequality relationship can be negative or positive, depending on the economy’s characteristics. Contrary to widespread claims, inequality per se does not impact growth through macroeconomic channels. Instead, both growth and inequality are impacted by changes in the underlying forms and pattern of income payments. However, inequality is critical at the microeconomic level as it explains differences in household propensities to consume which are at the foundation of neo-Kaleckian and Cambridge growth theory. Read full paper here.

Topics:
Matias Vernengo considers the following as important: , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Matias Vernengo writes Paul Davidson (1930-2024) and Post Keynesian Economics

Robert Skidelsky writes The Roots of Europe’s Immigration Problem – Project Syndicate

Nick Falvo writes Report finds insufficient daytime options for people experiencing homelessness

Nick Falvo writes Housing and homelessness in London (England)

Tom Palley on Inequality and Growth

New paper published by PERI. From the abstract:

This paper examines the relationship between inequality and growth in the neo-Kaleckian and Cambridge growth models. The paper explores the channels whereby functional and personal income distribution impact growth. The growth – inequality relationship can be negative or positive, depending on the economy’s characteristics. Contrary to widespread claims, inequality per se does not impact growth through macroeconomic channels. Instead, both growth and inequality are impacted by changes in the underlying forms and pattern of income payments. However, inequality is critical at the microeconomic level as it explains differences in household propensities to consume which are at the foundation of neo-Kaleckian and Cambridge growth theory.

Read full paper here.
Matias Vernengo
Econ Prof at @BucknellU Co-editor of ROKE & Co-Editor in Chief of the New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *