Summary:
Mortgage rates probably have to top 5% to tip housing into a recession-leading downturn I’ve pointed out many times that, generally speaking, mortgage rates lead home sales. It’s not the only thing — demographics certainly plays an important role — but over the long term interest rates have been very important. I have run the graph comparing mortgage rates to housing permits many times. In the graph below, I’m using a slightly different housing metric — private residential fixed investment as a share of GDP, both nominal (blue) and real (green), current through last Friday’s report on Q2 GDP. Here’s the long term view: We can see the leading relationship over the large majority of time frames in the last 50 years, with a few notable exceptions: the
Topics:
NewDealdemocrat considers the following as important: US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Mortgage rates probably have to top 5% to tip housing into a recession-leading downturn I’ve pointed out many times that, generally speaking, mortgage rates lead home sales. It’s not the only thing — demographics certainly plays an important role — but over the long term interest rates have been very important. I have run the graph comparing mortgage rates to housing permits many times. In the graph below, I’m using a slightly different housing metric — private residential fixed investment as a share of GDP, both nominal (blue) and real (green), current through last Friday’s report on Q2 GDP. Here’s the long term view: We can see the leading relationship over the large majority of time frames in the last 50 years, with a few notable exceptions: the
Topics:
NewDealdemocrat considers the following as important: US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Angry Bear writes Geneva plans to pay NGO wages after US foreign aid freeze
Bill Haskell writes Industrial Policy
Angry Bear writes Inflation. How worried should we be?
Angry Bear writes Tariffs Driving Drug Prices Higher
Mortgage rates probably have to top 5% to tip housing into a recession-leading downturn
I’ve pointed out many times that, generally speaking, mortgage rates lead home sales. It’s not the only thing — demographics certainly plays an important role — but over the long term interest rates have been very important.
I have run the graph comparing mortgage rates to housing permits many times. In the graph below, I’m using a slightly different housing metric — private residential fixed investment as a share of GDP, both nominal (blue) and real (green), current through last Friday’s report on Q2 GDP. Here’s the long term view:
We can see the leading relationship over the large majority of time frames in the last 50 years, with a few notable exceptions: the late 1960s and 1970s *huge* demographic tailwind of Baby Boomers reaching home-buying age, the 2000s housing bubble and bust, and 2014 (mainly due to the Millennial generation tailwind).
Here’s a close-up of this same graph beginning in 2015:
The increase in mortgage rates since late 2016 (blue in the graph bleow) has had a larger effect on private residential investment than the 2013-14 episode, probably because house prices are higher in real terms, as shown in the below comparison with wages (red):
House prices were near their 2012 housing bust bottom the first time mortgage rates went up. Now they are about 20% higher in real terms.
Finally, here is a more granular view of Treasury and mortgage interest rates over the past 18 months:
The decline in mortgage rates back below 4% in the middle of last year is probably what sparked the big increase in housing permits, starts, and sales last autumn and winter.
But because mortgage interest rates have actually increased a little bit over the last six months, I’m not expecting a similar rebound in housing this autumn.
At the same time, I can’t see much of a significant outright *decline* in YoY housing sale metrics — on the order of what we saw in 1999 before the 2001 recession — unless mortgage rates increase, at a minimum, to over 5%, and probably to 5.25%. We’ll see.