Sunday , December 15 2019
Home / The Angry Bear / Real decentralization is radical

Real decentralization is radical

Summary:
By David Zetland  (originally published at One handed economist) Real decentralization is radical Visionaries, consultants and public speakers love to explain how they are embracing distribution over decentralization over centralization, using an image like this: Figure 1 What drives me crazy about this image is that it actually undersells true decentralization, i.e., when everyone is connected to everyone: Really decentralized (D) We already have such systems for email (anyone on Earth can connect with anyone else without going through a censor, “chokepoint,” or authority), and cryptocurrencies offer the same connectivity for money. Note that mobile phones are not decentralized because they need to be connected to carriers, which also means that

Topics:
Dan Crawford considers the following as important: ,

This could be interesting, too:

NewDealdemocrat writes November average real wage growth stable, but aggregate growth now puts expansion in second place behind 1990s

Barkley Rosser writes Smoking At The Fed

NewDealdemocrat writes Scenes from the November jobs report

Dan Crawford writes The 2019 Globie: “Capitalism, Alone” by Branko Milanovic

by David Zetland  (originally published at One handed economist)

Real decentralization is radical

Visionaries, consultants and public speakers love to explain how they are embracing distribution over decentralization over centralization, using an image like this:

Real decentralization is radicalFigure 1

What drives me crazy about this image is that it actually undersells true decentralization, i.e., when everyone is connected to everyone:

Real decentralization is radicalReally decentralized (D)

We already have such systems for email (anyone on Earth can connect with anyone else without going through a censor, “chokepoint,” or authority), and cryptocurrencies offer the same connectivity for money.

Note that mobile phones are not decentralized because they need to be connected to carriers, which also means that mobile phone apps for messaging and payment are not decentralized. (I can’t install WePay on my phone, for example, because it’s not approved for the EU.)

These distinctions are important to people who support freedom of action, belief and existence — freedoms that are under assault in Hong Kong, Iran, China, and even the US (due to monopoly concentrations and government attempts to control private conversation).

Thus, we need to avoid debating “decentralization” within an Overton window preferred by authorities and would-be-monopolies. Those parties are happy with figures B and C because they can be monitored and controlled via critical nodes such as influencers, service providers, or content owners.

My one-handed conclusion is that citizens should insist on real decentralization. Choose D.

H/T to CD

Dan Crawford
aka Rdan owns, designs, moderates, and manages Angry Bear since 2007. Dan is the fourth ‘owner’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *