“The founder of the conservative “Article III Project” attorney Mike Davis ‘If this judge imposes a gag order on Trump, that should be immediately appealable,” he insisted. “The gag orders protect the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial. And defendants have First Amendment rights. So, if the defendant wants to speak, I can’t understand why a judge would put a gag order on that.'” As reported at Crooks and Liars, David Edwards. Why? It could be true trump could reveal incriminating evidence. Although, trump babbling about his innocence could also taint the potential pool of jurors. He is a national figure and has a large following. As it is, it will be difficult to find a jury which does not have ill or supportive feelings about
Topics:
Angry Bear considers the following as important: law, New York trial, politics, Trump
This could be interesting, too:
Joel Eissenberg writes Credit where credit is due
Bill Haskell writes Trump’s election interference trial in Manhattan
Angry Bear writes More on Reproductive Freedom…and Polling
Angry Bear writes Sovereign citizens
“The founder of the conservative “Article III Project” attorney Mike Davis
‘If this judge imposes a gag order on Trump, that should be immediately appealable,” he insisted. “The gag orders protect the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial. And defendants have First Amendment rights. So, if the defendant wants to speak, I can’t understand why a judge would put a gag order on that.'”
As reported at Crooks and Liars, David Edwards.
Why? It could be true trump could reveal incriminating evidence. Although, trump babbling about his innocence could also taint the potential pool of jurors. He is a national figure and has a large following. As it is, it will be difficult to find a jury which does not have ill or supportive feelings about trump.
The trump team could argue a gag order could impede his presidential aspirations too.