Initial claims move closer to red flag recession warning – by New Deal democrat Initial jobless claims declined -12,000 last week to 237,000. The four week average declined -6,750 to 246,750. With a one week delay, continuing claims increased 11,000 to 1,729,000: More importantly for forecasting purposes, the YoY% increases were 7.2% for the weekly number, 14.5% for the 4 week average, and 31.6% for continuing claims respectively: This is the 4th week in a row that the 4 week average has been higher YoY by more than 12.5%. If this continues for several more weeks, that would be sufficient to trigger a red flag recession warning from this series. Finally, since initial claims have a long-established history of leading the unemployment
Topics:
NewDealdemocrat considers the following as important: politics, US EConomics
This could be interesting, too:
Joel Eissenberg writes They’re coming for Social Security
Angry Bear writes Wages Have Not Caught Up with Previous Inflation
Bill Haskell writes Cannon ball don’t pay no mind . . .
Angry Bear writes Silence of the Lambs . . . Congress
Initial claims move closer to red flag recession warning
– by New Deal democrat
Initial jobless claims declined -12,000 last week to 237,000. The four week average declined -6,750 to 246,750. With a one week delay, continuing claims increased 11,000 to 1,729,000:
More importantly for forecasting purposes, the YoY% increases were 7.2% for the weekly number, 14.5% for the 4 week average, and 31.6% for continuing claims respectively:
This is the 4th week in a row that the 4 week average has been higher YoY by more than 12.5%. If this continues for several more weeks, that would be sufficient to trigger a red flag recession warning from this series.
Finally, since initial claims have a long-established history of leading the unemployment rate, here is the comparison of YoY claims averaged monthly (blue) as well as the 4 week average, compared with the YoY% change in the unemployment rate (gold):
Note importantly that the graph above measures the change in the unemployment rate as a “percent of a percent,” so for example a 10% increase from 3.6% would be just below 4.0%. To trigger the Sahm rule, we would need a 0.5% increase in the actual rate from the 3-month average of the lowest unemployment rate in the past year. To put it plainly: for forecasting purposes, we’re not there yet. But since the Sahm rule tells us retroactively when we have started a recession, it doesn’t affect my own forecasting analysis.
Initial jobless claims: moving closer to a red flag warning, Angry Bear, New Deal democrat