Monday , June 17 2024
Home / The Angry Bear / Tax the rich!

Tax the rich!

Summary:
I was a graduate student in a STEM program when Reagan was elected and the Laffer curve was used to justify tax cuts. The problem that immediately stood out to me at the time was that neither the ordinate nor the abscissa in the Laffer graph had scales, so it was impossible to assess where, exactly, the inflection point occurred. Based on the symmetrical drawing, we’re meant to infer that a 50% tax rate is the point after which government revenue would fall, but Laffer wasn’t even willing to support that inference by showing the scale on the X axis!From the Wikipedia page on the Laffer curve: ” . . . however, the curve might not have only a single peak, nor must it peak symmetrically at whatever value maximizes tax revenue. . .”The Laffer

Topics:
Joel Eissenberg considers the following as important: , , , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

NewDealdemocrat writes May CPI continued to be all about shelter

Eric Kramer writes The costs of stalemate in Ukraine

Bill Haskell writes Trump met with a New York City probation officer

Angry Bear writes If the consumer has nowhere else to go, they’ll pay whatever price is available.

I was a graduate student in a STEM program when Reagan was elected and the Laffer curve was used to justify tax cuts. The problem that immediately stood out to me at the time was that neither the ordinate nor the abscissa in the Laffer graph had scales, so it was impossible to assess where, exactly, the inflection point occurred. Based on the symmetrical drawing, we’re meant to infer that a 50% tax rate is the point after which government revenue would fall, but Laffer wasn’t even willing to support that inference by showing the scale on the X axis!

From the Wikipedia page on the Laffer curve:

” . . . however, the curve might not have only a single peak, nor must it peak symmetrically at whatever value maximizes tax revenue. . .”

The Laffer Curve

Kevin Drum has a post up linking to an article claiming that (a) economists across the political spectrum agree that the marginal top income tax rate should be increased and (b) that the optimal rate should be between 58% and 84%.

I’m not sure how much this matters, since the rich don’t get most of their wealth from salaries. I assume that the (bogus) Laffer curve incorporates all forms of taxation, but who knows?

Higher taxes for the rich

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *