Thursday , May 30 2024
Home / The Angry Bear / Are working class wages really still a malady?

Are working class wages really still a malady?

Summary:
The Bonddad Blog: Are working class wages really still a malady? New Deal democrat Via Kevin Drum, NY Times columnist Nick Kristof says, “There isn’t a good term for the bundle of pathologies that have afflicted working-class Americans . . . .” “One gauge of how many Americans are struggling is that average weekly nonsupervisory wages, a metric for blue-collar earnings, were lower in the first half of 2023 than they had been (adjusted for inflation) in the first half of 1969. That’s not a misprint.” Drum says that’s not true if you use the PCE deflator rather than CPI. But I’m dissatisfied for another reason – I don’t think weekly measures are appropriate. Here is the graph of Kristof’s metric: It does indeed show that weekly

Topics:
NewDealdemocrat considers the following as important: ,

This could be interesting, too:

NewDealdemocrat writes The good news, bad news economy

Angry Bear writes Senators Oppose Georgia-Pacific Two-Step Process Avoiding Financial Responsibility

Angry Bear writes People Moving Farther Out from City Centers to Avoid Exposure to Pandemics

NewDealdemocrat writes Repeat home sales indexes renew favorable YoY comparisons, suggest slow deceleration in shelter CPI to continue

The Bonddad Blog: Are working class wages really still a malady? New Deal democrat

Via Kevin Drum, NY Times columnist Nick Kristof says, “There isn’t a good term for the bundle of pathologies that have afflicted working-class Americans . . . .”

“One gauge of how many Americans are struggling is that average weekly nonsupervisory wages, a metric for blue-collar earnings, were lower in the first half of 2023 than they had been (adjusted for inflation) in the first half of 1969. That’s not a misprint.”

Drum says that’s not true if you use the PCE deflator rather than CPI. But I’m dissatisfied for another reason – I don’t think weekly measures are appropriate.

Here is the graph of Kristof’s metric:

Are working class wages really still a malady?

It does indeed show that weekly wages, even as of last month, were equal to wages in most of the latter part of the 1960s and early 1970s.

But the problem is that the work week itself has gotten much shorter in the past half century, declining from an average a little below 39 hours in the 1960s to under 34 hours in the past 15 years:

Are working class wages really still a malady?

It’s no wonder that, in real terms, people working 5 hours less per week might be earning less.

Indeed, as I have pointed out many times, real average *hourly* wages for nonsupervisory workers (red in the graph below) made a new all-time record earlier in the post-pandemic period, and are still higher than at any point before the pandemic now:

Are working class wages really still a malady?

But let me make a further comparison with real aggregate payrolls for nonsupervisory workers. In the below graph I also divide payrolls by the number of workers on payrolls as well as by inflation (gold):

Are working class wages really still a malady?

Real payroll per worker as of last month was within 1% of its value 50+ years ago in the late 1960s. If the economy continues to expand this year, there’s a pretty good chance it will surpass that level.

Bear in mind that the biggest reason of the decline in wages was the entrance of the huge baby boom into the jobs market, including for the first time most women. Once that was finally fully digested (in the 1990s) real wages started to rise again.

Real wages now are 20% – 25% higher now than they were at their nadir in the 1990s. There are certainly maladies affecting the working class, and over the long-term wages have been an issue, but certainly not recently.

Real average wages declining, while real aggregate payroll gains remain below peak, Angry Bear, by New Deal democrat.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *