Thursday , June 27 2024
Home / Lars P. Syll (page 208)
Lars Pålsson Syll
Professor at Malmö University. Primary research interest - the philosophy, history and methodology of economics.

Lars P. Syll

Lisa Gerrard

 [embedded content] I sing in the language of the heart, It’s an invented language that I’ve had for a very long time. I believe I started singing in it when I was about 12. Roughly that time. And I believed that I was speaking to God when I sang in that language.

Read More »

On randomization and regression (wonkish)

On randomization and regression (wonkish) Randomization does not justify the regression model, so that bias can be expected, and the usual formulas do not give the right variances. Moreover, regression need not improve precision … What is the source of the bias when regression models are applied to experimental data? In brief, the regression model assumes linear additive effects. Given the assignments, the response is taken to be a linear combina- tion of...

Read More »

Endogeneity bias — fiction in a fictitious world (wonkish)

Endogeneity bias — fiction in a fictitious world (wonkish) The bivariate model base and its a priori closure destines ‘endogeneity bias’ to a fictitious existence. That existence, in turn, confines applied research in a fictitious world. The concept loses its grip in empirical studies whose findings rely heavily on forecasting accuracy, e.g. a wide range of macro-modelling research as mentioned before. It remains thriving in areas where empirical results...

Read More »

My favourite statistics books

My favourite statistics books Mathematical statistician David Freedman‘s Statistical Models and Causal Inference (Cambridge University Press, 2010)  and Statistical Models: Theory and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2009) are marvellous books. They ought to be mandatory reading for every serious social scientist — including economists and econometricians — who doesn’t want to succumb to ad hoc assumptions and unsupported statistical conclusions! How...

Read More »

Paul Romer explains what went wrong with economics

Paul Romer explains what went wrong with economics Economists cannot simply dismiss as “absurd” or “impossible” the possibility that our profession has imposed total costs that exceed total benefits. And no, building a model which shows that it is logically possible for economists to make a positive net contribution is not going to make questions about our actual effect go away. Why don’t we just stipulate that economists are now so clever at building...

Read More »

Rejecting positivism — the case of statistics

Rejecting positivism — the case of statistics Rejecting positivism requires re-thinking the disciplines related to data analysis from the foundations. In this paper, we consider just one of the foundational concepts of statistics. The question we will explore is: What is the relationship between the numbers we use (the data) and external reality? The standard conception promoted in statistics is that numbers are FACTS. These are objective measures of...

Read More »

We need a ‘Fridays for Keynesianism’ movement!

Basically, the classical model is a model for a corn economy: households decide whether to consume the corn or to save it. If it is saved it can be supplied to investors who sow the grains, repaying to the households one period later the credit amount plus interest. In the Keynesian model the ‘funds’ exchanged on the capital market are made up of money—‘funds’ are bank deposits. Funds are not created here by a renunciation of consumption but by the banks granting credit … In...

Read More »