Steve Keen’s Debt Watch

One of the very enjoyable aspects of being in London is speaking regularly with Simon Rose on the business-oriented internet radio Share Radio. I know I can talk under wet cement; I think Simon could manage to talk after it had set solid. We have a great time bantering about topics economics, and I hope it's of interest to the audience as well. Here's the latest installment, with some earlier ones available here. [embedded content] This blog has been verified by Rise:...

The sound quality for the questions isn't too good, given the size of the room, but I hope the questions are clear from the answers I gave to them.

This is my keynote speech to the 2015 conference of the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy (EAEPE: http://eaepe.org/). In it I argue that a simple complex systems model captures most of the important economic dynamics of the last 30 years, even with the simplest possible economic relations and linear behavioural relations.

For seven years now, the rate The Fed sets to deter­mine the price banks pay to bor­row from it and from each other has been zero, or so close to zero that the dif­fer­ence is imma­te­r­ial. This is, his­tor­i­cally speak­ing, not nor­mal, and The Fed has a des­per­ate desire to return to what is nor­mal, which is rate a few per cent above the rate of infla­tion (see Fig­ure 1). Click here to read the rest of this post.

This is a quick 12 minute talk followed by about 18 minutes of discussion at the New Economics Foundation conference in Copenhagen.

This is the brief talk I gave at a conference celebrating 25 years of the Critical Realist seminar series at Cambridge University. Critical realists argue against the use of mathematics in economics; I argue here that it's the abuse of mathematics by Neoclassical economists--who practice what I have dubbed "Mythematics" rather than Mathematics--and that some phenomena are uncovered by mathematical logic that can't be discovered by verbal logic alone. I give the example of my own model of...

The Critical Realist movement, developed by Tony Lawson at Cambridge University, argues against the use of mathematics in economics. I argue that their critique is directed at the abuse of mathematics by Neoclassical economists, rather than the proper use of mathematics per se. In this brief talk--where for some reason my webcam was as static as a Neoclassical model--I explain that my 1995 complex systems model of Minsky...

Ordo-liberals like German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schauble insist that enforcing contracts is essential to capitalism, and when applied to financial contracts that means that debt forgiveness is out of the question. They also insist that a prudent government at least runs a balanced budget, and preferably a surplus. However it is easy to show that a pure capitalist economy with neither bankruptcy nor government counter-cyclical spending will collapse into a debt-deflation; and the crisis...

One thing my 28 years as a card-carrying econ­o­mist have taught me is that con­ven­tional eco­nomic the­ory is the best guide to what is likely to hap­pen in the economy. Read what­ever it advises or pre­dicts, and then advise or expect the oppo­site. You (almost) can’t go wrong. Click here to read the rest of this post.

There was a time when most educated people knew that the Earth was the center of the universe. There was a sophisticated “Geocentric” model, known as the “Ptolemaic system”, that predicted to very high accuracy the observed movement of all the objects in the Heavens, as they purportedly orbited the Earth on perfect crystalline spheres. 500 years ago, anyone who proposed an alternative model—in which the Sun was the center and the Earth was just another planet orbiting it—was derided as a...