by Wren-Lewis and austerity dodging In the ongoing austerity debate, Brad DeLong told Simon Wren-Lewis the other day to stop dodging and instead squarely face the fact that most mainstream economists who were heard in the public sphere were not against austerity, but rather split, with, if anything, louder and larger voices on the pro-austerity side. But Wren-Lewis still thinks neither people outside economics, nor economists, know how representative of the majority of economists are those economists the media choose to publicise. In Wren-Lewis’ view the majority of academic macroeconomists have always been against austerity. Economists and economics are simply ‘misrepresented’ in his view. Misrepresented or not, he sure can’t have got that view from his Swedish collaborator Lars Calmfors (one of Sweden’s most well-known ‘elite’ mainstream macroeconomists). For more than 25 years this economist has told us that lowering wages is the solution to macroeconomic problems: 1991. Unemployment: 3,9% March: “We must be able to lower the wages” Dagens Nyheter April: ”Lower wages saves employment” Aftonbladet June: ”Flexible wages can save the jobs” Dagens Nyheter September: ”Lower the wages to save the jobs!” Expressen 1994. Unemployment: 10,6% April: ”Lower wages gives us more jobs” Aftonbladet 1998.
Topics:
Lars Pålsson Syll considers the following as important: Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Klas Eklunds ‘Vår ekonomi’ — lärobok med stora brister
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Ekonomisk politik och finanspolitiska ramverk
Lars Pålsson Syll writes NAIRU — a harmful fairy tale
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Isabella Weber on sellers inflation
Wren-Lewis and austerity dodging
In the ongoing austerity debate, Brad DeLong told Simon Wren-Lewis the other day to stop dodging and instead squarely face the fact that
most mainstream economists who were heard in the public sphere were not against austerity, but rather split, with, if anything, louder and larger voices on the pro-austerity side.
But Wren-Lewis still thinks neither people outside economics, nor economists, know how representative of the majority of economists are those economists the media choose to publicise. In Wren-Lewis’ view the majority of academic macroeconomists have always been against austerity. Economists and economics are simply ‘misrepresented’ in his view.
Misrepresented or not, he sure can’t have got that view from his Swedish collaborator Lars Calmfors (one of Sweden’s most well-known ‘elite’ mainstream macroeconomists). For more than 25 years this economist has told us that lowering wages is the solution to macroeconomic problems:
1991. Unemployment: 3,9%
March: “We must be able to lower the wages”
Dagens NyheterApril: ”Lower wages saves employment”
AftonbladetJune: ”Flexible wages can save the jobs”
Dagens NyheterSeptember: ”Lower the wages to save the jobs!”
Expressen1994. Unemployment: 10,6%
April: ”Lower wages gives us more jobs”
Aftonbladet1998. Unemployment: 9,3%
January: ”Lower wage costs drastically … or we risk to get stuck with high unemployment”
Dagens Nyheter2007. Unemployment: 6,2%
January: ”Lower unemployment benefits give new jobs”
Aftonbladet2013. Unemployment: 8,1%
March: ”Wage costs are too high”
Svenska Dagbladet
To me that sounds like the thing I’ve heard repeated ad nauseam for four decades when talking to mainstream economists …