Summary:
I don't know who John Adams is, but he seems to be a gold and silver bug and very right wing in his economics and maybe even be a libertarian. I'm not an economist but I began to see his arguments were nonsense. For instance, he says that MMT states that printing more money is not inflationary when the economy is under productive because the new money will produce more goods and services, but he goes on to say that adding more money to the money supply is always inflationary without saying why this is; he simply states this as a fact. [embedded content]
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
I don't know who John Adams is, but he seems to be a gold and silver bug and very right wing in his economics and maybe even be a libertarian. I'm not an economist but I began to see his arguments were nonsense. For instance, he says that MMT states that printing more money is not inflationary when the economy is under productive because the new money will produce more goods and services, but he goes on to say that adding more money to the money supply is always inflationary without saying why this is; he simply states this as a fact.I don't know who John Adams is, but he seems to be a gold and silver bug and very right wing in his economics and maybe even be a libertarian. I'm not an economist but I began to see his arguments were nonsense. For instance, he says that MMT states that printing more money is not inflationary when the economy is under productive because the new money will produce more goods and services, but he goes on to say that adding more money to the money supply is always inflationary without saying why this is; he simply states this as a fact. [embedded content]
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
Robert Vienneau writes Why Is Marginalist Economics Wrong?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?