by This is interesting, do you think in images or words? I thought everyone thought in words. I think in words and probably do too much thinking, but I'm also good at visualizing. When I studied electronics, maths, and physics I used a lot of visualization to understand the topics.When I think about MMT I think in words, but I can also see the banks, the off-shore tax havens, and people working and spending their money.I knew some people weren't good at visualising things, but I never knew that 30% to 50% of people of people think in images and have to translate that into words. It turns out that 30% of Jordan Peterson's audience thought in words, 30% in pictures, and 30% did both. I guess I come in the both category. But thinking primarily in pictures and not using words seems odd to me.
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
Robert Vienneau writes Why Is Marginalist Economics Wrong?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
When I think about MMT I think in words, but I can also see the banks, the off-shore tax havens, and people working and spending their money.
I knew some people weren't good at visualising things, but I never knew that 30% to 50% of people of people think in images and have to translate that into words. It turns out that 30% of Jordan Peterson's audience thought in words, 30% in pictures, and 30% did both. I guess I come in the both category. But thinking primarily in pictures and not using words seems odd to me.