by Summary:
Entertaining to watch all the cognitively under-developed Peterson people having a really bad year now under Trump/GOP administration: Working with substantially higher funding limits, thanks to this spring’s two-year budget deal, Congress' spending leaders have fought about how and where to spend an extra 0 billion — not what to cut — making the Obama administration look like an era of austerity by comparison. “Budgeting was supposed to mean: If you want more of something, you have less of something else,” said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. “But instead of ‘plus one, minus one,’ it became ‘plus one, plus one.'" https://t.co/eCBTus1kZu — CRFB.org (@BudgetHawks) October 21, 2018
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Entertaining to watch all the cognitively under-developed Peterson people having a really bad year now under Trump/GOP administration: Working with substantially higher funding limits, thanks to this spring’s two-year budget deal, Congress' spending leaders have fought about how and where to spend an extra 0 billion — not what to cut — making the Obama administration look like an era of austerity by comparison. “Budgeting was supposed to mean: If you want more of something, you have less of something else,” said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. “But instead of ‘plus one, minus one,’ it became ‘plus one, plus one.'" https://t.co/eCBTus1kZu — CRFB.org (@BudgetHawks) October 21, 2018
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Matias Vernengo writes What is heterodox economics?
Entertaining to watch all the cognitively under-developed Peterson people having a really bad year now under Trump/GOP administration:
Working with substantially higher funding limits, thanks to this spring’s two-year budget deal, Congress' spending leaders have fought about how and where to spend an extra $300 billion — not what to cut — making the Obama administration look like an era of austerity by comparison.
“Budgeting was supposed to mean: If you want more of something, you have less of something else,” said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. “But instead of ‘plus one, minus one,’ it became ‘plus one, plus one.'" https://t.co/eCBTus1kZu— CRFB.org (@BudgetHawks) October 21, 2018