by Summary:
Bill clarifies the MMT position on trade for those who haven't gotten it yet. It is very clear and concise. Anyone that still doesn't get it after reading this doesn't want to get it.Must-read — and study. It's the MMT elevator speech on trade.Bill Mitchell – billy blogA surplus of trade discussions Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, AustraliaSee alsoBond EconomicsOn The "Everyone Cannot Run Trades Deficits" ArgumentBrian Romanchuk
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: MMT, trade
This could be interesting, too:
Bill clarifies the MMT position on trade for those who haven't gotten it yet. It is very clear and concise. Anyone that still doesn't get it after reading this doesn't want to get it.Must-read — and study. It's the MMT elevator speech on trade.Bill Mitchell – billy blogA surplus of trade discussions Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, AustraliaSee alsoBond EconomicsOn The "Everyone Cannot Run Trades Deficits" ArgumentBrian Romanchuk
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: MMT, trade
This could be interesting, too:
Mike Norman writes Jared Bernstein, total idiot. You have to see this to believe it.
Frances Coppola writes Trade lunacy is back
Steve Roth writes MMT and the Wealth of Nations, Revisited
Angry Bear writes Policies Shifted Trade from China?
Bill clarifies the MMT position on trade for those who haven't gotten it yet. It is very clear and concise. Anyone that still doesn't get it after reading this doesn't want to get it.
Must-read — and study. It's the MMT elevator speech on trade.
Bill Mitchell – billy blog
A surplus of trade discussions
Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
See also
Bond Economics
On The "Everyone Cannot Run Trades Deficits" ArgumentBrian Romanchuk