Friday , April 4 2025
Home / Mike Norman Economics / Senate voted 67 to 31 for Bank Reform

Senate voted 67 to 31 for Bank Reform

Summary:
Now over to the House...This from the article: The bill would allow custody banks such as BNY Mellon and State Street Corp to exempt the customer deposits they place with central banks from a stringent capital calculation requirement. Is this supposed to mean that it does not apply to banking firms such as JPM, C, BAC, etc? Here is the language from the S.2155 Definition.—In this section, the term “custodial bank” means any depository institution holding company predominantly engaged in custody, safekeeping, and asset servicing activities, including any insured depository institution subsidiary of such a holding company. I can't tell.... not being trained as a lawyer :p I am assuming that the language of the bill would make it applicable to any banking firm that at least maintains

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Jeremy Smith writes UK workers’ pay over 6 years – just about keeping up with inflation (but one sector does much better…)

Robert Vienneau writes The Emergence of Triple Switching and the Rarity of Reswitching Explained

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Schuldenbremse bye bye

Robert Skidelsky writes Lord Skidelsky to ask His Majesty’s Government what is their policy with regard to the Ukraine war following the new policy of the government of the United States of America.


Now over to the House...

This from the article:

The bill would allow custody banks such as BNY Mellon and State Street Corp to exempt the customer deposits they place with central banks from a stringent capital calculation requirement.

Is this supposed to mean that it does not apply to banking firms such as JPM, C, BAC, etc?

Here is the language from the S.2155

Definition.—In this section, the term “custodial bank” means any depository institution holding company predominantly engaged in custody, safekeeping, and asset servicing activities, including any insured depository institution subsidiary of such a holding company.

I can't tell.... not being trained as a lawyer :p

I am assuming that the language of the bill would make it applicable to any banking firm that at least maintains custodial accounts in a subsidiary.

While imo the sentence from the article does not imply this.

Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *