Friday , May 16 2025
Home / Mike Norman Economics / Senate voted 67 to 31 for Bank Reform

Senate voted 67 to 31 for Bank Reform

Summary:
Now over to the House...This from the article: The bill would allow custody banks such as BNY Mellon and State Street Corp to exempt the customer deposits they place with central banks from a stringent capital calculation requirement. Is this supposed to mean that it does not apply to banking firms such as JPM, C, BAC, etc? Here is the language from the S.2155 Definition.—In this section, the term “custodial bank” means any depository institution holding company predominantly engaged in custody, safekeeping, and asset servicing activities, including any insured depository institution subsidiary of such a holding company. I can't tell.... not being trained as a lawyer :p I am assuming that the language of the bill would make it applicable to any banking firm that at least maintains

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Robert Vienneau writes Austrian Capital Theory And Triple-Switching In The Corn-Tractor Model

Mike Norman writes The Accursed Tariffs — NeilW

Mike Norman writes IRS has agreed to share migrants’ tax information with ICE

Mike Norman writes Trump’s “Liberation Day”: Another PR Gag, or Global Reorientation Turning Point? — Simplicius


Now over to the House...

This from the article:

The bill would allow custody banks such as BNY Mellon and State Street Corp to exempt the customer deposits they place with central banks from a stringent capital calculation requirement.

Is this supposed to mean that it does not apply to banking firms such as JPM, C, BAC, etc?

Here is the language from the S.2155

Definition.—In this section, the term “custodial bank” means any depository institution holding company predominantly engaged in custody, safekeeping, and asset servicing activities, including any insured depository institution subsidiary of such a holding company.

I can't tell.... not being trained as a lawyer :p

I am assuming that the language of the bill would make it applicable to any banking firm that at least maintains custodial accounts in a subsidiary.

While imo the sentence from the article does not imply this.

Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *