by Back to slow growth from the lower levels: Durable goods orders: Capital goods: It’s gone from bad to worse. Hard to see how this can continue much longer: Trump’s Wiretap Claims: What We Know and What We Don’t White House sources acknowledge that Trump had no idea whether the claims he was making were true when he made them. He was basing his claims on media reports—some of them months old—about the possibility that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court may have authorized surveillance of Trump associates, presumably pursuant to a federal investigation of their ties to Russia. Later Saturday morning, White House Counsel Don McGahn told staffers to avoid discussions about the president’s tweets or any possible investigation—an order that effectively paralyzed the White House staff for much of the day. Staffers were afraid to talk to one another for fear of running afoul of McGahn’s guidance and even those authorized to talk to the media were nervous about doing so. At 8:55 on Sunday morning, the White House issued a statement about the president’s tweets and the ensuing controversy. “Reports concerning potentially politically motivated investigations immediately ahead of the 2016 election are very troubling. President Donald J.
Topics:
WARREN MOSLER considers the following as important: Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
Merijn T. Knibbe writes Using the Theil inequality index to show and analyse increased colonial exploitation
Dean Baker writes Global warming and the threat of cheap Chinese EVs
John Quiggin writes Grading the Budget, or not
Angry Bear writes Last Week in the Inland Empire …
Back to slow growth from the lower levels:
Durable goods orders:
Capital goods:
It’s gone from bad to worse. Hard to see how this can continue much longer:
Trump’s Wiretap Claims: What We Know and What We Don’t
White House sources acknowledge that Trump had no idea whether the claims he was making were true when he made them. He was basing his claims on media reports—some of them months old—about the possibility that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court may have authorized surveillance of Trump associates, presumably pursuant to a federal investigation of their ties to Russia.
Later Saturday morning, White House Counsel Don McGahn told staffers to avoid discussions about the president’s tweets or any possible investigation—an order that effectively paralyzed the White House staff for much of the day. Staffers were afraid to talk to one another for fear of running afoul of McGahn’s guidance and even those authorized to talk to the media were nervous about doing so.
At 8:55 on Sunday morning, the White House issued a statement about the president’s tweets and the ensuing controversy. “Reports concerning potentially politically motivated investigations immediately ahead of the 2016 election are very troubling. President Donald J. Trump is requesting that as part of their investigation into Russian activity, the congressional intelligence committees exercise their oversight authority to determine whether executive branch investigative powers were abused in 2016. Neither the White House nor the President will comment further until such oversight is conducted.”
The formal language masks the rather extraordinary work that this statement is doing: The White House is asking Congress to investigate in order to determine whether President Trump’s tweeted claims were true.