Wednesday , September 30 2020
Home / Naked Keynesianism / Friedman vs. Wicksell

Friedman vs. Wicksell

Summary:
Slowly, but steadily the Wicksellian concept of a natural, normal or neutral rate of interest is making a come back and becoming more relevant and cited than Friedman's natural rate of unemployment and its awkward twin the Non Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment (NAIRU).Note that up to Friedman's infamous presidential address the normal rate dominated the field. But in all fairness, even thought it has lost space it seems that Friedman's natural rate of unemployment has a lot of inertia, and might be with us for a while.

Topics:
Matias Vernengo considers the following as important: , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Robert Vienneau writes Jonathan Nitzan On The Factual And Logical Invalidity Of Neoclassical Economics

Matias Vernengo writes Di Bucchianico on Krugman and the Liquidity Trap

Mike Norman writes Bill Mitchell — The Bandwagon effect – caution not credit is needed

Mike Norman writes “Natural Rate”–What if it isn’t? — Matt Reed

Slowly, but steadily the Wicksellian concept of a natural, normal or neutral rate of interest is making a come back and becoming more relevant and cited than Friedman's natural rate of unemployment and its awkward twin the Non Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment (NAIRU).

Friedman vs. Wicksell

Note that up to Friedman's infamous presidential address the normal rate dominated the field. But in all fairness, even thought it has lost space it seems that Friedman's natural rate of unemployment has a lot of inertia, and might be with us for a while.

Matias Vernengo
Econ Prof at @BucknellU Co-editor of ROKE & Co-Editor in Chief of the New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *