Monday , May 13 2024
Home / Video / Ngannou or Gane?

Ngannou or Gane?

Summary:
Who you got tonight?

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

NewDealdemocrat writes Weekly Indicators May 6 – 10 by New Deal democrat

Angry Bear writes A Bit of History by a Friend from Slate’s “The Fray”

Angry Bear writes Oil industry is Writing Executive Orders for Trump to Sign

Angry Bear writes 2024 SOCIAL SECURITY REPORT IS OUT THE MEDIA MISS THE POINT

Who you got tonight?
Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

24 comments

  1. You know what Mike that's exactly what Joe Biden's going to do brag about a surplus. And the shame is most people will applaud him for it what a f**** world

  2. the surplus was caused by Elon paying 11 billion in taxes . Federal govt and IRS going after tax dodgers and large corporations now.

  3. Gane baby.

  4. Ngannau looked the most ripped he has been. So I’d say he is in shape and should destroy.

  5. Could this all be mainly about crushing the "great resignation"? Like a mini Volcker shock?

  6. Hope for Gane but Ngannou is one scary dude.

  7. You watch ufc? ! You know I may subscribe your work just for that!!!

  8. Luckily you are better at the market!!! 😂

  9. បេះដូង

    Finally, Mike came to his senses, embracing Michael Burry and Peter Schiff. Lol.

  10. Great work as always Mike! Thanks for the weekend updates! Looking forward to Monday's MMT Report!

  11. Did I type Norman or Shift on the YouTube search box? They are printing money! Go Ngannou
    Moreno is too annoying

  12. Oh man tough call!! If it goes past half the second round Gane has a good chance. It will be very tough for Gane early. That said. I think I’m going Ngannou he’s just too strong. And his technique is good now.

  13. what happened to Mikes website and services ?

  14. Mr Norman, who do you like in the Rams/Bucs and Bills/Chiefs ? [I'll take the contrarian put … ; ) ]

  15. បេះដូង

    The fight didn't live up to the hype. Both fighters can be beaten by Jon Jones if he's able to carry his power to heavyweight.

  16. Mike…don't forget about sectoral balances

  17. 5:30 No, you're wrong! NO-ONE is going to "learn a lesson in MMT", from your channel at least, however hard they try, because you spend 75% of your time repeating the same thing like a broken record in every single video. The only new info here is from 6:10 onwards.

    The only people you respond to are the haters, which I guess is because you've got a very fragile ego. You completely ignore questions from those like me who are GENUINELY interested, and supportive of your ideas. If you included the answers to their questions in your videos, you may gain some new and interesting content, and wouldn't have to repeat yourself so often!

    So, I'll try, ONCE AGAIN!

    Yes, it's clear that interest rates are a large component of inflation. However, WHY do the mainstream media and politicians push the idea that raising rates controls inflation? Maybe if we understood that, we'd be better able to explain to them why they're wrong!

    I understand that people misunderstood the consequences of Paul Volker's policies in the 70s/80s, and also that the oil crisis was a major factor (supply chain issues). However, that's not a good explanation.

    My guess is that they believe that increasing the cost of everything by increasing rates is beneficial because it increases tax revenues across the board, and thus reduces the money supply. It would also decrease demand, which would decrease the velocity of money, meaning there would be less money exchanging hands, which means that inflation would not be realized. If this is what they believe, then why is "the cost of credit is reflected in the cost of all goods and services" so much more important?

    Just note, I'm going to ignore any replies from anyone who isn't Mike, as they don't help understand Mike's theories, and they usually just repeat what everyone already know anyway (and often just state the obvious).

  18. The Buffalo Bills used to be called the Buffalo Bisons, but a vote was takin after so many unfortunately kept referring to them as the “Buffalo Bills” after a notorious Indian slaver.
    They need to change the name back to Bisons considering there is one proudly displaced on their helmets and effectively the buffalo is the national animal.
    What goes on at Arrowhead stadium is disgusting with all the tomahawk chopping and that mocking chant that is soooo 50’s Westerns type depiction of native Americans.
    I wanted Buffalo. What Allen did in an away game in a stadium where the crowd were very much the “12th man” I would say he was the better quarter back.
    Not sure Mahomes could do as well under the same conditions.

  19. You gonna come out and say you were wrong about buying banks?

  20. Your entire analysis is based on the erroneous idea that economics is zero-sum. Figure it out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *