by From the Federal Reserve Board press release: "The Committee currently expects that, with gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace and labor market indicators will continue to strengthen. However, global economic and financial developments continue to pose risks. Inflation is expected to remain low in the near term, in part because of earlier declines in energy prices, but to rise to 2 percent over the medium term as the transitory effects of declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the labor market strengthens further." For that reason: "The Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 1/4 to 1/2 percent. The stance of monetary policy remains accommodative, thereby supporting further improvement in labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation." There was one dissenting vote, Esther George the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, who wanted to hike the rate to 0.75%.Although they cite the international situation as the cause for caution, my hunch is that the slow recovery also played a role. And the doubts about the idea that we are below the natural rate with unemployment at 4.9% must be at the center of Yellen's decision.
Topics:
Matias Vernengo considers the following as important: inflation, Natural Rate, Slow recovery, Yellen
This could be interesting, too:
Matias Vernengo writes Elon Musk (& Vivek Ramaswamy) on hardship, because he knows so much about it
Matias Vernengo writes The second coming of Trumponomics
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Central bank independence — a convenient illusion
Merijn T. Knibbe writes How to deal with inflation?
For that reason:"The Committee currently expects that, with gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace and labor market indicators will continue to strengthen. However, global economic and financial developments continue to pose risks. Inflation is expected to remain low in the near term, in part because of earlier declines in energy prices, but to rise to 2 percent over the medium term as the transitory effects of declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the labor market strengthens further."
There was one dissenting vote, Esther George the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, who wanted to hike the rate to 0.75%."The Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 1/4 to 1/2 percent. The stance of monetary policy remains accommodative, thereby supporting further improvement in labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation."
Although they cite the international situation as the cause for caution, my hunch is that the slow recovery also played a role. And the doubts about the idea that we are below the natural rate with unemployment at 4.9% must be at the center of Yellen's decision.