Thomas Palley claims MMT fails to provide plausible macroeconomics Modern Money Theory (MMT) asserts society can enjoy a range of large government programs for free via money financed deficits, all without inflation … Recently, progressive Democrats have called for a range of programs … All of them can reasonably be argued for. However, there is also the question of how they will be financed. Proponents of MMT assert that is a non-problem and the programs...
Read More »John Maynard Keynes — an introduction
John Maynard Keynes — an introduction [embedded content]
Read More »Bab’Aziz
[embedded content]
Read More »Poem of the atoms
Poem of the atoms [embedded content]
Read More »Debunking the balanced budget superstition
Debunking the balanced budget superstition [embedded content] I think there is an element of truth in the view that the superstition that the budget must be balanced at all times [is necessary]. Once it is debunked, [it] takes away one of the bulwarks that every society must have against expenditure out of control. There must be discipline in the allocation of resources or you will have anarchistic chaos and inefficiency. And one of the functions of old...
Read More »Richard Wolff on what MMT has taught us
Richard Wolff on what MMT has taught us [embedded content]
Read More »Inflation targeting — the wrong tool for the wrong purpose
Inflation targeting — the wrong tool for the wrong purpose [embedded content]
Read More »MMT — vad är det?
MMT — vad är det? Överskottsmålet är ett hål i huvudet. Riksbanken kommer inte att nå sitt inflationsmål. Euron är dysfunktionell och eurokrisen kommer tillbaka vid nästa recession. Se där tre bra utgångspunkter för den som vill förstå hur ekonomin kommer att utvecklas det närmaste året. Låter det både stolligt, alarmistiskt och populistiskt? Möjligt, men det finns en röd tråd i dessa utsagor. De bygger på de insikter som vuxit fram i det som kallas Modern...
Read More »Radical uncertainty — a question of economic methodology
Radical uncertainty — a question of economic methodology Between 1920 and 1950, a debate took place which defined the future of economics in the second half of the 20th century. On one side were John Maynard Keynes and Frank Knight; on the other, Frank Ramsey and Jimmie Savage. Knight and Keynes believed in the ubiquity of “radical uncertainty”. Not only did we not know what was going to happen, we had a very limited ability to even describe the things that...
Read More »What ought to be the role of money and markets in society
What ought to be the role of money and markets in society [embedded content] As Karl Polanyi argued already in the 1940s — it is dangerous to allow markets ’embed’ society. Having unfettered markets and money take over society is a sure recipe for only one thing. Disaster. On both a human and ecological scale. What we see happen in the US, the UK, Germany, Sweden, and elsewhere, is deeply disturbing. The rising inequality is outrageous. Societies where we...
Read More »