Summary:
I was hunting for the exact location of "Prince's Tavern" in Manchester in 1833 when I stumbled upon an Economist article from March 30, 1844 addressing the "practical consequences" of reducing the length of the factory working day from 12 hours to 10. I am always fascinating by the profound and enduring hostility of a faction of employers -- amplified by their mouthpieces in academia and the press -- to the reduction of working time. I'm amazed how often their bile and zeal leads them to compound the error of biased, unfounded assumptions with boneheaded accounting mistakes. Sound like criticism of MMT today. EconospeakA "Wild and Dangerous" Scheme! Sandwichman
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: Capital, capitalism, Employment, labor, workday
This could be interesting, too:
I was hunting for the exact location of "Prince's Tavern" in Manchester in 1833 when I stumbled upon an Economist article from March 30, 1844 addressing the "practical consequences" of reducing the length of the factory working day from 12 hours to 10. I am always fascinating by the profound and enduring hostility of a faction of employers -- amplified by their mouthpieces in academia and the press -- to the reduction of working time. I'm amazed how often their bile and zeal leads them to compound the error of biased, unfounded assumptions with boneheaded accounting mistakes. Sound like criticism of MMT today. EconospeakA "Wild and Dangerous" Scheme! Sandwichman
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: Capital, capitalism, Employment, labor, workday
This could be interesting, too:
NewDealdemocrat writes Real average wages and aggregate payrolls signal continued growth
Bill Haskell writes Hey, Its Employment at Will!
Angry Bear writes Jimmy Hoffa’s dream versus Jimmy Hoffa’s worst nightmare
Joel Eissenberg writes Capitalism prevails
I was hunting for the exact location of "Prince's Tavern" in Manchester in 1833 when I stumbled upon an Economist article from March 30, 1844 addressing the "practical consequences" of reducing the length of the factory working day from 12 hours to 10. I am always fascinating by the profound and enduring hostility of a faction of employers -- amplified by their mouthpieces in academia and the press -- to the reduction of working time. I'm amazed how often their bile and zeal leads them to compound the error of biased, unfounded assumptions with boneheaded accounting mistakes.Sound like criticism of MMT today.
Sandwichman