Saturday , September 28 2024
Home / Tag Archives: Uncategorized (page 169)

Tag Archives: Uncategorized

Beyond mathematical modelling

from Lars Syll Mathematical modelling has now dominated the economics academy for so long that younger people that emerge from economic studies who are dissatisfied with what they are taught, cannot think beyond the modelling. They have been immersed in it so long that it is a kind of common sense to them. The idea that modelling is bound to be almost always irrelevant just does not compute for many. Yet they recognize that modern academic economics mostly does not provide any insights....

Read More »

Steve Keen vs. Nordhaus – regarding humankind’s greatest ever crisis

from Edward Fullbrook Steve Keen’s new paper “The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change,” would benefit humankind if it were widely read by economists.¹  There are two ways you can obtain it: Go here at Taylor & Francis and pay £35 Go here and download it for free. Here is its conclusion: Conclusion: drastically underestimating economic damages from global warming Were climate change an effectively trivial area of public policy, then the appallingly bad work done by...

Read More »

The information conundrum

from Peter Radford Kolmogorov, I think, hit the nail on the head when he said: “At each given moment there is only a fine layer between the ‘trivial’ and the impossible.  Mathematical discoveries are made in this layer.” He might just as well have said that life itself is discovered in this layer.  But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. A few days ago I tried to point our way towards an acceptance of a certain humility.  I used a couple of quotes, one from Durer and one from Soros, to...

Read More »

MMT basics

from Lars Syll We have already shown that deficit spending increases our collective savings. But what happens if Uncle Sam borrows when he runs a deficit? Is that wht eats up savings and forces interest rates higher? The answer is no. The financial crowding-out story asks us to imagine that there’s a fixed supply of savings from which anyone can attempt to borrow … MMT rejects the loanable funds story, which is rooted in the idea that borrowing is limited by access to scarce financial...

Read More »

What The Democratic Senators Were thinking

As is very rare, I find myself disagreeing with Josh Marshall who asked “What Were the Democratic Senators Thinking?” when they agreed to accept Representative Jaime Herrera-Butler’s assertions (that Trump sided with the insurgents over minority leader McCarthy) in writing when Trump’s lawyers stipulated that they could be assumed to be accurate. First I will play amateur lawyer (and link to an actual lawyer who contested Marshall and was posted...

Read More »

It takes a theory to beat a theory

from Yoshinori Shiozawa (originally a comment) At around the same time that Fred Lee and Lars Syll visited the University of California and talked long on Sraffa with Axel Leijonhufvud, a paper by Avi J Cohen appeared in Eastern Economic Journal: “The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions”: Progress in Microeconomics since Sraffa (1926)? (Vol. 9, No. 3, 1983, pp. 213-220). It was a short paper that counts only eight pages, but a decisive criticism of economics of perfect...

Read More »

Regular Email News

My regular email with news of what I’ve been doing is here. Signup for this list is here. I also have a mailing list focused on Adani and related issues, to which you can sign up here Share this:Like this:Like Loading...

Read More »

What do Durer and Soros have in common?

from Peter Radford I know, this is one of those more philosophical moments.  In my case prompted by my continued meditation on the deleterious effects of a belief in utopias.  Such beliefs seem always to end up with authoritarian consequences.  People can all too easily get swept up by the illusion of having solved life’s great mysteries.  It’s been going on for ages.  It appears to be a commonly held human attribute.  We need, apparently, to think we understand things that are,...

Read More »

“Pure Economics”

from Ikonoclast  (originally a comment) The whole idea that economics and the economy exist as a self contained discipline and a self-contained system respectively is absurd. First, there is a natural system, the biosphere, which contains economics activity and upon which economic activity is dependent. Second, there is politics and force (power) which condition economic activity. In relation to the second, Chomsky writes of: “…American Liberalism, reiterated… in the Clinton doctrine,...

Read More »