Law professor Eric Segall is a leading critic of the Supreme Court. In a blog post today, he doesn’t pull any punches:
The disaster that was the Trump v. United States oral argument reminded me of how little the Roberts Court has actually cared about rule of law values and legal transparency during its 18-year run. Leaving aside the overturning or narrowing of numerous landmark cases from abortion to affirmative action to the free exercise of religion, the Roberts Court has consistently, in the Court’s most important and publicized opinions, engaged in subterfuge, sleight of hand, and even outright lying.
In this post, I discuss landmark cases involving affirmative action, health care, voting rights, separation of church and state, and the
Read More »